Skip to main content
AB 1127 hub
California Law · AB 1127

The re-roster window

Could an affected pistol ever return to dealer shelves? That turns on the microstamping determination clock, a slow-moving, contested process. This page is forward-looking analysis, hedged on purpose: it maps the dates and the scenarios so you know what to monitor.
Review window
2026 → 2027
DOJ viability determinations
Potential cliff
JAN 1, 2028
Semiauto rules could tighten
Today
PPT OPEN
Regardless of outcome

Determination windows

California's roster has long been entangled with a microstampingrequirement, a technology mandate that has kept most new semiauto designs off the approved list. Two windows drive what happens next.

Jul 1, 2026 → Jul 1, 2027
DOJ viability review

A rolling period in which the DOJ is directed to assess whether microstamping technology is available and technologically viable. These determinations feed directly into what can be added to (or must eventually meet) roster requirements.

Toward Jan 1, 2028
Potential semiauto cliff

Depending on those determinations and how litigation resolves, semiautomatic pistol roster rules could tighten further around this date. A potential outcome, not a certainty: a date to watch, not a settled deadline.

What re-rostering would actually require

For an affected model to be sold new by dealers again, more than one thing has to break the right way. A court could enjoin or narrow AB 1127; and/or the roster framework itself would have to admit the design, which, today, runs through the microstamping viability finding. Absent either, the design-based bar stands even for a pistol that could otherwise qualify.

Scenarios

Two branches, read at a high level. Neither is a forecast; they're the shape of what each outcome would mean.

DimensionIf AB 1127 is affirmedIf AB 1127 is struck down
Dealer new saleStays barred for cruciform-bar modelsReturns, still gated by roster + microstamping
PPT pathUnchanged, remains the routeUnchanged, still available
OwnershipNever affected either wayNever affected either way
Microstamping cliffStill looms independently (2028)Still looms independently (2028)

What it means for owners

If you already own an affected pistol, AB 1127 does not make that ownership unlawful, in any scenario. Meanwhile the Private Party Transfer path remains the lawful way for these models to change hands, regardless of how the re-roster question resolves.

The stable takeaway

Every branch above leaves two things constant: you can keep what you own, and you can acquire an affected model by PPT. Everything else is the part worth watching. We'll reflect any change on the litigation tracker.

Last verified Jul 5, 2026Informational only, not legal advicea forward-looking read, not a prediction

SourcesCA DOJ certified handgunsPen. Code § 31910 (microstamping)

Get the weekly Roster and Law brief

One email a week on California roster changes, new laws and court rulings. Alerts when something changes.

For adults 18 and over. By subscribing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe any time.